HARMORA

Coherent Accessibility Function

A translation layer equation for dimensional gating across domains

Core Formula

Deff = Dmax × Φ(C)
Symbol Name Definition Range
Deff Effective Dimensionality The number of dimensions/states actually accessible to the system [1, Dmax]
Dmax Maximum Dimensionality Theoretical upper bound of available dimensions/states Domain-dependent
Φ(C) Coherence Function Normalized measure of system organization/coherence [0, 1]

Interpretation

  • Φ(C) = 1: Full coherence → All dimensions accessible → Maximum options
  • Φ(C) = 0: No coherence → Collapsed to single state → No options
  • 0 < Φ(C) < 1: Partial coherence → Proportional dimensional access

Mathematical Derivation

Origin: Participation Ratio

The formula derives from the Participation Ratio (PR) in quantum mechanics, which quantifies how many basis states effectively contribute to a quantum state.

PR = 1 / Σi pi²

Where pi = |⟨i|ψ⟩|² are the probabilities of finding the system in basis state |i⟩.

Connection to Purity

For a density matrix ρ, the purity is defined as:

γ = Tr(ρ²)

Purity ranges from 1/D (maximally mixed) to 1 (pure state). The participation ratio relates inversely:

PR = 1/γ = 1/Tr(ρ²)

Generalization to Coherence Function

Normalizing to [0,1] and generalizing beyond quantum systems:

Φ(C) = (PR - 1) / (Dmax - 1)

This yields the core relationship:

Deff = Dmax × Φ(C)

The effective dimensionality equals maximum dimensionality scaled by the coherence function.

Forms of Φ(C)

The coherence function can take different forms depending on system dynamics:

Exponential Decay

Φ(C) = e-λt

Describes rapid decoherence under environmental coupling. λ is the decoherence rate.

  • Quantum systems with thermal baths
  • Systems with strong dissipation
  • Time-dependent coherence loss

Power Law

Φ(C) = Cα

Describes gradual scaling where C is a coherence measure and α is a scaling exponent.

  • Scale-invariant systems
  • Critical phenomena
  • Self-organized systems

Participation Ratio

Φ(C) = 1 / Σ pi²

Direct measure from probability distribution over states.

  • Quantum state analysis
  • Statistical distributions
  • Information-theoretic measures

Threshold Function

Φ(C) = σ(β(C - C0))

Sigmoid function for systems with critical thresholds. C0 is critical coherence, β is steepness.

  • Phase transitions
  • Activation dynamics
  • Bistable systems

Domain Applications

Quantum Systems

Dmax Hilbert space dimension (number of basis states)
Φ(C) Purity function: Tr(ρ²) or normalized participation ratio
Deff Effective number of superposed states contributing to dynamics
Example: A 5-qubit system has Dmax = 2⁵ = 32 states. With Φ(C) = 0.5, the effective dimensionality is Deff = 32 × 0.5 = 16 accessible states.

Atmospheric Dynamics (Polar Vortex)

Dmax Possible vortex configurations (unified, displaced, split, fragmented)
Φ(C) Coherence index derived from temperature gradient and wind shear
Deff Vortex stability state
Φ(C) = (1 - |∇T|/|∇T|max) × (U/Umax)
State Mapping:
  • Φ > 0.7 → Unified vortex (stable)
  • 0.5 < Φ ≤ 0.7 → Weakening
  • 0.3 < Φ ≤ 0.5 → Split/displaced
  • Φ ≤ 0.3 → Fragmented (SSW event)

Information Systems

Dmax Total information capacity (Shannon entropy upper bound)
Φ(C) Integration measure (ratio of actual to potential information integration)
Deff Accessible information states

Network Coordination

Dmax Possible coordinated states (2n for n nodes)
Φ(C) Alignment/synchronization measure across network
Deff Achievable coordinated actions

Mathematical Properties

Boundedness

1 ≤ Deff ≤ Dmax

Effective dimensionality is always bounded by maximum dimensionality.

Multiplicative Scaling

Deff ∝ Φ(C)

Accessibility scales linearly with coherence, not additively.

Domain Independence

The functional form Deff = Dmax × Φ(C) holds regardless of domain. Only the definitions of Dmax and Φ(C) change.

Coherence as Gating

Coherence does not create dimensionality—it gates access to existing dimensions. Dmax is always present; Φ(C) determines accessibility.

Implications

A domain-independent measure of effective dimensionality opens applications wherever systems require coherence to function.

Climate & Atmospheric Prediction

Real-time coherence indices for atmospheric systems could provide early warning of state transitions — vortex destabilization, extreme weather windows, monsoon timing. Current models compute dynamics; coherence measures could predict when dynamics become unstable.

Network Resilience

Power grids, communication networks, supply chains — any system where failure cascades. Coherence measurement identifies fragmentation risk before failure occurs. Infrastructure operators could monitor effective dimensionality as a leading indicator.

Materials & Manufacturing

Material properties depend on internal coherence — crystal structure, grain boundaries, defect density. A coherence function could characterize material quality, predict failure points, or optimize manufacturing processes for higher effective organization.

Signal Processing & Communication

Coherence already matters in optics and radio. Generalizing to effective dimensionality provides a unified measure across modalities — how much information a channel can actually carry given its current coherence state.

Biological Systems

Living systems maintain coherence against entropy. Measuring effective dimensionality in neural activity, cardiac rhythms, or immune response could distinguish healthy function from fragmented states — early detection through coherence loss.

Financial & Economic Systems

Markets fragment before crashes. Coherence indices across asset correlations, trading networks, or institutional behavior could identify when systems lose effective dimensionality — fewer options, increased fragility.

Energy Systems

Efficiency is coherence — organized energy transfer versus dissipation. From battery degradation to fusion plasma stability, measuring coherence provides insight into how much of available energy is actually accessible for work.

Organizational Dynamics

Teams, companies, institutions — coordination capacity depends on alignment. Effective dimensionality measures what a group can actually accomplish together, distinct from theoretical capability.

These applications share a common structure: maximum potential exists (Dmax), but realized capability depends on system organization (Φ(C)). The formula provides a unified framework for measuring this relationship across domains.

Development Timeline

August 18, 2024

Exponential Multiplication Discovered

Binary operation a ⊗ b = a × 2b identified. Unity doubling principle (1 ⊗ 1 = 2) established. Connection to harmonic scaling systems recognized.

August 19, 2025

Quantum Formulation & Coherence Connection

Purity P(ρ) = Tr(ρ²) and effective dimensionality Beff = 1/P(ρ) connected. Graph/network theory, fractal representation, and master equation formalized.

October 24, 2025

Multi-Layer Framework Formalized

Four-layer mathematical system documented: State Evolution, Multi-Scale (Renorm), Information Layer with C(t) = Tr(ρ²), and Universal Objective function.

November 2025

Polar Vortex Application

Deff = Dmax × Φ(C) applied to atmospheric science. Coherence index developed from temperature gradient and wind shear data.

December 2025

SSW Event Validation

Model validated against historical Sudden Stratospheric Warming events (1979, 2009, 2018, 2021). Predicted vortex split during Dec 2025 SSW confirmed.

January 2026

EVOLVE7 Stability Framework

Seven-level auto-scaling stability framework developed. Coherence epistemology outlined. Cross-domain translation formalized.

February 2026

Scientific Documentation

Public documentation of mathematical framework. Formula categorized as Coherent Accessibility Function.

References & Foundational Literature

[1] Bell, R. J. & Dean, P. (1970). "Atomic vibrations in vitreous silica." Discussions of the Faraday Society, 50, 55-61. — Original introduction of participation ratio for localization in disordered systems.
[2] Thouless, D. J. (1974). "Electrons in disordered systems and the theory of localization." Physics Reports, 13(3), 93-142. — Participation ratio as measure of state delocalization.
[3] Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press. — Purity Tr(ρ²) and quantum state characterization.
[4] Lindblad, G. (1976). "On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups." Communications in Mathematical Physics, 48(2), 119-130. — Master equation for open quantum system evolution.
[5] Zurek, W. H. (2003). "Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical." Reviews of Modern Physics, 75(3), 715-775. — Coherence and decoherence in quantum-classical transition.
[6] Baldwin, M. P. et al. (2021). "Sudden Stratospheric Warmings." Reviews of Geophysics, 59(1). — Atmospheric dynamics and polar vortex behavior.

The coherent accessibility function Deff = Dmax × Φ(C) generalizes the participation ratio from quantum mechanics to a domain-independent framework. The contribution is the recognition that this relationship applies universally to systems where coherence determines accessibility.

Contact

For inquiries regarding this framework:

Hector Damian Cirino

iamhectordc@gmail.com